Mainstream internet porn, made by men for men, often alienates women. Rebecca Reid reports on a growing trend
From the article :
“The sexiest thing you can see on the internet right now involves no seeing at all.
Just like hipsters who eschew the technology of iPods for record players, Audible Porn skips the graphic, high definition money shots in favour of pure sound…..
The lack of visual stimulation leaves the consumer to do some of the work. Listening to someone else’s heavy breathing is arousing, but it’s only explosive when you join the fantasy, when you give that stranger a form in your mind, and imagine what they’re doing. It’s much like the difference between reading a book and seeing a film….
Recording your sex life allows you to indulge your exhibitionist streak, whether you end up posting it or deleting it afterwards. It’s a different way of consuming erotica, one that doesn’t present fake, idealised bodies. Nor is there the same need to fake orgasms. It’s a kind of porn that encourages your imagination and engagement. It’s porn that cares about a woman’s pleasure. ”
Read more :
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/women/sex/11416240…
Interesting reaction to the ubiquitous mainstream in-your-face porn fare. It’s not as though visual porn can’t be subtle, though, if it’s lit well. I’d argue most people would prefer to look at attractive people fucking authentically, with cinematic lighting that creates both mood and mystery.
Amanda x